QB | RB | WR | TE | OT | OG | C | DE | DT | OLB | ILB | CB | S

WR

1. Keenan Allen, California………………………………………………………….6’2″ – 206 lb.

2. Robert Woods, USC — Scouting Report……………………………………..6’0⅜” – 201 lb.

3. Tavon Austin, West Virginia — Scouting Report……………………………..5’8½” – 174 lb.

4. DeAndre Hopkins, Clemson — Scouting Report……………………………….6’1″ – 214 lb.

5. Cordarrelle Patterson, Tennessee — Scouting Report………………………6’1⅞” – 216 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

6. Quinton Patton, Louisiana Tech…………………………………………………6’0″ – 204 lb.

7. Da’Rick Rogers, Tennessee Tech…………………………………………….6’2½” – 217 lb.

8. Markus Wheaton, Oregon State……………………………………………….5’11” – 189 lb.

9. Ryan Swope, Texas A&M – Scouting Report……………………………….6’0¼” – 205 lb.

10. Stedman Bailey, West Virginia – Scouting Report………………………5’10¼” – 193 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

11. Justin Hunter, Tennessee — Scouting Report………………………………..6’4″ – 196 lb.

12. Chris Harper, Kansas State………………………………………………….6’0¾” – 229 lb.

13. Aaron Dobson, Marshall………………………………………………………..6’3″ – 210 lb.

14. Marquise Goodwin, Texas……………………………………………………5’8⅞” – 183 lb.

15. Terrance Williams, Baylor………………………………………………………6’2″ – 208 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

16. Cobi Hamilton, Arkansas — Scouting Report………………………………6’1¾” – 312 lb.

17. Kenny Stills, Oklahoma………………………………………………………6’0½” – 194 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

18. Corey Fuller, Virginia Tech……………………………………………………..6’2″ – 204 lb.

19. Mark Harrison, Rutgers……………………………………………………….6’2⅞” / 231 lb.

20. Marquess Wilson, Washington State……………………………………….6’2⅝” – 194 lb.

21. Ace Sanders, South Carolina – Scouting Report……………………………5’7″ – 173 lb.

22. Conner Vernon, Duke…………………………………………………………6’0¼” – 196 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

Note: In order to appeal to the masses, I will use a combination of tiers and numbered ranking. The tiers are the main focus when deciphering what these rankings really mean. Prospects who are grouped in the same tier (separated by the lines) are essentially similar level prospects in terms of “draftability” that simply have different skillsets and scheme fits and therefore will have different value based on the scheme they are drafted into.  The numbers are simply my personal preference when it comes to general ability and talent.  The tiers are far more important.  My proposed scheme fits for prospects and overall skills can be found in each prospect’s scouting report.  If there is not a scouting report posted yet, be patient!  Also, these rankings are fluid and ever-changing as I roll through more and more film up until I set my final rankings and big board a week or more before draft day.

Advertisements