QB | RB | WR | TE | OT | OG | C | DE | DT | OLB | ILB | CB | S

CB

1. Dee Milliner, Alabama………………………………………………………..5’11⅞” – 201 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

2. Jamar Taylor, Boise State……………………………………………………5’10⅝” – 192 lb.

3. Xavier Rhodes, Florida State…………………………………………………..6’1½” – 210 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

4. Johnthan Banks, Mississippi State…………………………………………….6’2″ – 185 lb.

5. Desmond Trufant, Washington………………………………………………5’11⅝” – 190 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

6. D.J. Hayden, Houston…………………………………………………………..5’11” – 191

7. Jordan Poyer, Oregon State………………………………………………….5’11⅞” – 197 lb.

8. Blidi Wreh-Wilson, Connecticut……………………………………………….6’0¾” – 195 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

9. Darius Slay, Mississippi State………………………………………………….6’0″ – 192 lb.

10. David Amerson, North Carolina State…………………………………………6’1″ – 205 lb.

11. Logan Ryan, Rutgers………………………………………………………..5’11⅛” – 191 lb.

12. Leon McFadden, San Diego State…………………………………………..5’10” – 193 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

13. Robert Alford, Southeastern Louisiana…………………………………….5’10⅛” – 188 lb.

14. B.W. Webb, William & Mary……………………………………………….5’10¼” – 184 lb.

15. Sanders Commings, Georgia………………………………………………..6’0⅛” – 216 lb.

————————————————————————————————————————–

16. Will Davis, Utah State……………………………………………………….5’11¼” – 186 lb.

17. Tharold Simon, LSU…………………………………………………………….6’2″ – 202 lb.

18. Tyrann Mathieu, LSU — Scouting Report…………………………………..5’8¾” – 186 lb.

19. Dwayne Gratz, Connecticut…………………………………………………..5’11” – 201 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

20. Adrian Bushell, Louisville…………………………………………………….5’9⅜” – 186 lb.

21. Micah Hyde, Iowa……………………………………………………………5’11¾” – 197 lb.

22. Nickell Robey, USC…………………………………………………………..5’7¼” – 169 lb.

—————————————————————————————————————————

Note: In order to appeal to the masses, I will use a combination of tiers and numbered ranking. The tiers are the main focus when deciphering what these rankings really mean. Prospects who are grouped in the same tier (separated by the lines) are essentially similar level prospects in terms of “draftability” that simply have different skillsets and scheme fits and therefore will have different value based on the scheme they are drafted into.  The numbers are simply my personal preference when it comes to general ability and talent.  The tiers are far more important.  My proposed scheme fits for prospects and overall skills can be found in each prospect’s scouting report.  If there is not a scouting report posted yet, be patient!  Also, these rankings are fluid and ever-changing as I roll through more and more film up until I set my final rankings and big board a week or more before draft day.

Advertisements